The Daily Meme #722!

avatar

We need more granularity in proposal voting.

image.png

Lots of people are not happy with how the dao is making its way.
The current structure is not granular enough.
Some measure of negative votes needs to be seen in the ui's, if not on the chain itself.
I'd suggest the same for witness voting.

How can we gauge displeasure when the ui's don't allow us a way to measure it?

@hive.blog @peakd @ecency @dbuzz @liketu @peak.open


This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

image.png
Sign in here.



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

I agree with this. Don't just show the level of support. Show the level of opposition to a proposal.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'd suggest the same for witness voting.

You just reminded me of before the top 200 witness were listed. Was it as low as the top 30 being listed at one time? Sounds insane in hindsight.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It may have been the top 50?
I remember having to know the witness's name beyond that.
But, it's been 500 on peakd for a long time.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Kudos to peakd!

Perhaps they might be interested to add a one pinned post option to profiles using the account owner's JSON Metadata while loading the profile to know which one is pinned.

0
0
0.000
avatar

In fact, we should be able to see who downvotes us. By the way, I am against downvote.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You can see it on hivetasks.com, or one of the other block explorers.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hay buenos y malos gobiernos pero el de Venezuela es el peor..

0
0
0.000