RE: MEME: Pictures are worth a thousand words. Pictures with words are even better...
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
upon seeing the footage of flash-bangs seemingly thrown to aggravate the crowd, with snipers positioned, I keep wondering if the purpose in someone's mind was to get whoever would be armed to bring out their weapon. Since no-one was armed, it just made the Capitol Police look like meanies.
I'll have to look for other sources for Lonnie Coffman - the source shows he pleaded guilty to one count of possession of unregistered firearm.
I started reading the Guy Reffitt dockets and when the expert said people forced their way into the Capitol Building, it didn't sync with the video footage showing them open the secure doors for them. Poison tree - poison fruit.
I'll look at the last one at some point, but I just get frustrated anytime anyone of any political leaning tells half the truth to make their point come out on top! I appreciate you bringing these up, and I am not accusing you of such. Just aching for honesty! And honestly, if the testimony is slanted, then how can I trust it on matters I do not happen to know the opposite is true. People were held in tortuous conditions until they agreed to plea guilty so they can try to live their lives again. I don't trust anything that comes out of this response to the protest and riot.
Hi Havestmoon! Totally understand, this is why I linked the court documents because I felt they'd be the least biased, most fact based documents available to the public.
Not everyone involved in J6 has pled guilty, and so with those trials we'll be able to see if there is evidence to prove criminality.
In regards to the force entry, don't forget that the Capitol building is just massive, with many entrances and lots of different sections and rooms. We've seen footage of people breaking windows and climbing in. We've seen hundreds of people pushing directly against the outmanned Capitol Police. There are literally thousands of stories about that day.
They were let in. No guns were Visible. Nobody was using guns. Meanwhile, BLM/Antifa zero such scrutiny. We known who the terrorists are and which side overwhelmingly resorts to assassination and violence.
I find court documents are usually very revealing. That doesn't mean that they are decided correctly. I don't see the pressures of plea bargaining being docketed. Maybe I haven't looked hard enough. It'd be nice to see a docket saying "Prosecution offers defense a plea of one count of possession of unlicensed firearm if defense agrees that Proud Boys is a White Supremacist group." Be aware the transparency doesn't always translate to action to right a wrong. A medical study comes to mind where the data in the study contradicted the conclusion of the study. Nothing was done to correct that because the conclusion was politically correct.
No, of course... but at least with some transparency we can make up our own minds.
I'd love to see dockets saying things like that, that'd be amazing. There's so much data that suggests a solid number of guilty pleas are because of unrelenting promises made and incredible pressure... and not because, you know, the person is guilty.
Lip service. You have no issues with Antifa and BLM, yet jan6 was Armed Insurrection!
The same with dismissing massive voter fraud as "unconvincing". Well you went to bat trying to discredit and " debunk" 2000 mules, even though, you had not even known about it before. You're a shill. This is 80 million votes:
80 million votes for someone who literally could not draw ANY CROWD, during the primary, and all through until he got selected at 4 Am EST indicated as a mathematical definition of fraud.
You knew about 2000 mules because you clearly brought it up:
https://ecency.com/hive-122315/@aussieninja/re-dwinblood-rdfulu
Under Oath. Debunked by someone who never watched the documentary.
You're still Shilling, shilling for 80 million votes. You won't be persuaded at all by documentary evidence, you dismiss GPS location tracking which is exactly what Geolocation data refers to, (NOT triangulation by cell towers) (which even on 3g can transmit NO PROBLEM, since it has nothing to do with radio signals from CELLULAR TOWERS, but radio signals Received from satellites IT pings, the cellular data it sends and receives after that has no bearing on the location data it interprets EXCLUSIVELY FROM MULTIPLE SATELLITES, AS GPS IS NOT INCUMBENT ON CELL SERVICE) and try to claim that its perfectly legal to do their neighbors a favor and drop a ballot off, illuminating how ignorant of the process you are, and finally to exemplify the lack of credibility, you shill that people receiving ballots, mail in ballots, that they didn't request, is nothing wrong. You seem to think that nothing has been compromised. In fact, its illegal, unlawful, and goes counter to maintaining voter integrity, now that one person is in possession of multiple ballots.