Web 3.0 Is Lame - Where's Web 4.0?

The operators doing V2K with remote neural monitoring want me to believe this lady @battleaxe is an operator. She is involved in the same discord groups around @fyrstikken and friends. Her discord is Battleaxe#1003. Shes in some groups with seemingly detached characters that dont even acknowledge the others in the group, looking oddly staged. She starts projects and does nothing with it or the delegations after its used to sway people. Like @steempowertwins does<------fake along with her @teamgood <------fake. No substance in her comments and has a following that adores her for what? Life coach she is not nor is she insightful with any meaningful skills to follow. Ruler of pixie dust maybe? I would like for someone to show me but probably wont out fear maybe? @fyrstikken groups around him down voted me into censored and not viewable on my accounts as soon I told what they were doing.
I cant prove @battleaxe is the one directly doing the V2K and RNM. Doing it requires more than one person at the least. It cant be done alone. She cant prove she is not one of the ones doing V2K because she cant and could care less. I guarantee she knows this is going around and still wont prove it because she cant. Many of us here can prove what they have been doing to survive the past 5 years. What does she live off of? It definitely isnt in public view here.

I was drugged in my home covertly, it ended badly. They have been trying to kill me using RNM with applied V2K mental games while revealing as many accessories to the crime as they can. I bet nobody does anything at all. Ask @battleaxe to prove it. I bet she wont. Pretty serious accusations to just blow off and leave the crypto community hanging in fear of this danger.

They want me to believe the V2K and RNM in me is being broadcast from her location. And what the fuck is "HOMELAND SECURITY" doing about this shit? I think stumbling over their own dicks maybe? Just like they did and are doing with the Havana Syndrome. They should start by looking at the communications between the top witnesses of Hive and the connection to @fyrstikken groups. Google his fucking name and see where his other interests lie around at least once maybe? The connections between @fyrstikken groups and all the exchanges built for Hive? Bet that would reveal some crazy ball less nutty shit. Homeland security should start preparing for their own incarcerations seeing how sloppy this was done. Patriot act my ass. Think we are really fools? Bad position your not getting out of. Dont be last to blow the whistle. Who will protect you?

People in and around @fyrstikkens groups are reckless and should have shown the proper media what they had before taking me hostage for 5 long torturing years and counting. That is a long time to wait for someone to die.

What would you say while having a gun pointed at your head from an undisclosed location? Have people find it? My hands are tied while they play like children with a gun to my head. Its a terrorist act on American soil while some yawn and say its not real or Im a mental case. Many know its real. This is an ignored detrimental to humanity domestic threat. Ask informed soldiers in the American military what their oath is and why nothing is being done. Nobody has I guess. Maybe someone told ill informed soldiers they cant protect America from military leaders in control that have ill intent. How do we protect locked up soldiers prevented from telling the truth from being treated as criminals? Not to mention civilians we let our leaders treat the same way. https://ecency.com/fyrstikken/@fairandbalanced/i-am-the-only-motherfucker-on-the-internet-pointing-to-a-direct-source-for-voice-to-skull-electronic-terrorism-terrorism

The operators doing V2K with remote neural monitoring want me to believe this lady @battleaxe is an operator. She is involved in the same discord groups around @fyrstikken and friends. Her discord is Battleaxe#1003. Shes in some groups with seemingly detached characters that dont even acknowledge the others in the group, looking oddly staged. She starts projects and does nothing with it or the delegations after its used to sway people. Like @steempowertwins does<------fake along with her @teamgood <------fake. No substance in her comments and has a following that adores her for what? Life coach she is not nor is she insightful with any meaningful skills to follow. Ruler of pixie dust maybe? I would like for someone to show me but probably wont out fear maybe? @fyrstikken groups around him down voted me into censored and not viewable on my accounts as soon I told what they were doing.
I cant prove @battleaxe is the one directly doing the V2K and RNM. Doing it requires more than one person at the least. It cant be done alone. She cant prove she is not one of the ones doing V2K because she cant and could care less. I guarantee she knows this is going around and still wont prove it because she cant. Many of us here can prove what they have been doing to survive the past 5 years. What does she live off of? It definitely isnt in public view here.

I was drugged in my home covertly, it ended badly. They have been trying to kill me using RNM with applied V2K mental games while revealing as many accessories to the crime as they can. I bet nobody does anything at all. Ask @battleaxe to prove it. I bet she wont. Pretty serious accusations to just blow off and leave the crypto community hanging in fear of this danger.

They want me to believe the V2K and RNM in me is being broadcast from her location. And what the fuck is "HOMELAND SECURITY" doing about this shit? I think stumbling over their own dicks maybe? Just like they did and are doing with the Havana Syndrome. They should start by looking at the communications between the top witnesses of Hive and the connection to @fyrstikken groups. Google his fucking name and see where his other interests lie around at least once maybe? The connections between @fyrstikken groups and all the exchanges built for Hive? Bet that would reveal some crazy ball less nutty shit. Homeland security should start preparing for their own incarcerations seeing how sloppy this was done. Patriot act my ass. Think we are really fools? Bad position your not getting out of. Dont be last to blow the whistle. Who will protect you?

People in and around @fyrstikkens groups are reckless and should have shown the proper media what they had before taking me hostage for 5 long torturing years and counting. That is a long time to wait for someone to die.

What would you say while having a gun pointed at your head from an undisclosed location? Have people find it? My hands are tied while they play like children with a gun to my head. Its a terrorist act on American soil while some yawn and say its not real or Im a mental case. Many know its real. This is an ignored detrimental to humanity domestic threat. Ask informed soldiers in the American military what their oath is and why nothing is being done. Nobody has I guess. Maybe someone told ill informed soldiers they cant protect America from military leaders in control that have ill intent. How do we protect locked up soldiers prevented from telling the truth from being treated as criminals? Not to mention civilians we let our leaders treat the same way. https://ecency.com/fyrstikken/@fairandbalanced/i-am-the-only-motherfucker-on-the-internet-pointing-to-a-direct-source-for-voice-to-skull-electronic-terrorism-terrorism

The term "Web 2.0" was a marketing gimmick created by a marketing department for a computer conference. The term "Web 3.0" is a marketing gimmick made up by people wanting to sell crypto.

My guess is that there is a marketing department somewhere that will use the term to sell some sort of product or technology.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta

hehe... I feel you ;) !1UP

	You have received a 1UP from @mango-juice! The following @oneup-cartel family members will soon upvote your post: @monster-curator, @oneup-curator, @leo-curator, @meme-curator, @thg-curator, @vyb-curator, @pob-curator And they will bring !PIZZA 🍕

^{Learn more about our delegation service to earn daily rewards. Join the family on Discord.}

Hope not to miss!
Have a great day.
!LOLZ
!PIZZA

I think you're looking at the surface but not noticing the substance. The way you describe it is web 2.0 was like web 1.0 but the nerds didn't have the capital to do what big businesses investing their resources could do. That's a rather simplistic analysis.

O>k. Breaking it down starting with paragraph #2. Going back to first paragraph at the end.
This will take several replies.

You wrote:

Web 1.0 was based on individuals who were tech savvy enough to build a website with one way communication. The website owner could push out information to the reader and it was mostly the responsibility of the reader to keep themselves up to date on what was going on the various websites they followed. Videos and images were small to non-existent because an image or video hosted on 1.0 was very expensive and took a long time to load.

I assume here you are referring to static webpages. You're probably not counting when the Domain Name System was established with TLDs like .com starting in 1985. I think what you count as "web 1.0" begins with the first page of thw World Wide Web in 1991 (http://info.cern.ch). I believe you're starting in 1991 because "a website with one way communication" would exclude the USENET and BBSs (Bulletin Board Systems) which had already been established during the 1980s.

The way I read that paragraph your "web 1.0" seems to be static WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) pages which were coded with HTML.

You wrote also:

Then we got web 2.0. This is when we got more of an ability for multimedia and two way communication on websites. As people could input more data and were more able to use media that made it easy to get more information across in a shorter amount of time like photos and videos, the website owner as influencer was quickly replaced by the curated person with no technical savvy as influencer. Now instead of having to build a website, an influencer could just create a profile and could interact with millions of people on one of the many platforms.

O.K. Roughly 1995ish now with what "web 2.0" beginning seems to be for you I believe. Yahoo! Geocities. Very crude search engines. Instead of static WYSIWYG "influencers" got a template provided by a service provider. Companies could afford to buy servers and with government cooperation worked out larger pipelines in networks for data transmission. The millions of interactions was a much lter phenomenon of web 2.0. Even by the year 2002 thousands of visitors to a site each month was considerably impressive.

You also wrote:

On Web 2.0 it was easy to keep up with what was going on with those you follow because it's all in the same place and algorithms pushed stuff they knew you were interested in as you scrolled.

I am not sure what "it's all in the same place" is supposed to mean. Maybe how many sites allow users to sign in with a Facebook or Google account and the Google and Facebook algorithms "pushed stuff" even though you weren't on either platform and using a different site with the signin from those platforms?

But what about Web 3.0? Well, we're back to influencers being those tech savvy enough to build on the blockchain. Blockchains are also often slow, expensive, and don't hold much information. Most NFT's for instance aren't held on chain and rely on web 2.0 infrastructure to make them work. Similarly, most communication is done on web 2.0.

That's not a step back though. Blockchains are "slow" but that's on purpose. Some blockchains are faster than others. It's not the same as thing as dial-up Internet access which had limitations due to telephone lines.

Dion't worry about NFTs on hive-engine. Those are stored on IPFS. Not sure if you count IPFS decentralization as "web 2.0" but it's better than an Ethereum project minting using Google Cloud.

Finally,

The similarities from Web 1.0 and Web 3.0 are pretty striking if you think about it.

Not really. Web 2.0 maybe more so to web 3.0 but web 1.0 is radically different from web 3.0. For paradigms maybe there is parallel but the implementation and underlying technology are radically different. Think of it this way: If you buy a digital AM/FM radio off Amazon today and go back in time to early 1940s Los Angeles you'd still be able to receive a radio signal from KNX 1070 like you could in 2022 but the circuitry of your 2022 radio would still be radically different from any 1943 radio even though both have on the surface an antenna, speaker, and dial and both receive the same radio broadcast.