selling polycub

avatar

1

Do you know don Quijote? the guy that fights against windmills?

Polycub is the same with 50% penalty. There will be a point the 50% fee is not worth taking.

I don't know when the point is.

We are in the first week of polycub with the highest inflation ( token distribution).

Next week is less and the week after it reduce again.

So when comes to the point it's not worth paying the 50% fee?

for now, maybe it's worth paying the fee and stake into xpolycub.

I expect after the first 4 weeks we see something happen.

Not sure how it will turn out, maybe it rushes to zero :P.

But I expect some appreciation of the rarety of polycub.

1000 polycub today are in 4 weeks more polycub. Maybe 2000 or more.

But after 4 weeks 2000 polycub will be 4 weeks later maybe only 2200 polycub ( staking in xpolycub).

With the idea, the token will not go to 0 and the protocol owned liquidy does something, it could be a good play to stake and do nothing.

Also to earn and do nothing. Because it will be much more difficult to earn those tokens in 4 weeks.

I'm not sure how xpolycub will work after inflation goes to 0. So not sure there will be any yield on it.

12

Some words to polycub

The idea is cool, but it's IMO really bad to not release papers before release. IMO there was no reason to hold it back.

I don't see a benefit to letting people be uneducated about the mechanics.

Another point was the delay, I think that kills a lot of momentum and excitement about polycub.

I would wish for the next leo expansion to clear papers and clear mechanics before the release.

Special because I think future expansions should attract more attention. Finished papers can be shared.

Finish infographics too.

@leofinance if you need some help with eyecatching and easy-to-understand info products, feel free to hit me up.

Or hit up someone else for that, but I really think Leofinance would benefit massively with easy-to-understand and shareable info-products.

special community can share it on twitter and other social media channels.

Anyway, keep staking!



0
0
0.000
4 comments
avatar

The people doing V2K with remote neural monitoring want me to believe this lady @battleaxe is an operator. She is involved deeply with her group and @fyrstikken . Her discord is Battleaxe#1003. I cant prove she is the one directly doing the V2K and RNM. Doing it requires more than one person at the least. It cant be done alone. She cant prove she is not one of the ones doing it. I was drugged in my home covertly, it ended badly. They have tried to kill me and are still trying to kill me. I bet nobody does anything at all. Ask @battleaxe to prove it. I bet she wont. They want me to believe the V2K and RNM in me is being broadcast from her location. And what the fuck is "HOMELAND SECURITY" doing about this shit? I think stumbling over their own dicks maybe? Just like they did and are doing with the Havana Syndrome https://ecency.com/fyrstikken/@fairandbalanced/i-am-the-only-motherfucker-on-the-internet-pointing-to-a-direct-source-for-voice-to-skull-electronic-terrorism

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't see a benefit to letting people be uneducated about the mechanics.

I'm sure some people did.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree that the design docs should have been released earlier. It looks like they were quite rushed as they kept delaying the launch.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000