The Daily Meme #1184!
For the few of you that were here when I was going sooo hard against folks claiming to be anarchists, here is one reason why.
Anybody can claim to be an anarchist, but that doesn't mean much.
IF other people don't agree you are an anarchist, you probably are not.
Unless you are ready to give all you have in pursuit of freedom for others that you are unlikely to ever enjoy yourself, you are probably not an anarchist.
If you believe that only non-violence can lead to peaceful coexistences, then you are a voluntaryist, and not an anarchist.
There is a long history in the anarchic story that clearly demonstrates that anarchists don't accept that yelling in the streets at empty buildings will lead to the change we demand.
Go to any anarchist influenced demonstration and you will see levels of violence.
These levels have a long history in anarchist tactics.
Sending the blacbloc in amongst women and children to get them tear gassed, too, is a bad look.
We stopped doing that years ago.
Now zones are established with clear boundaries, you will do well to establish these levels if you wish to avoid physical state repression.
Why would we not use the tools established by the rulers?
They see violence as perfectly acceptable to attain their ends.
Just ask them, they don't have any shame left in them.
Are you are tired of paying your masters to bomb children in far away places?
Perhaps it is time you pushed back on that.
A simple way that anybody can do that is to hoard your coins.
The fed buys coins at face value from the mint.
A dollar of change in your pocket is a dollar of value out of the banksters' pockets.
Stop playing in their shell game that allows them to play in the amusement parks from hell and shop in the human grocery stores.
Death to Discord!
Long live Hive Messenger!
Billy Jack, the movie.
The Trial of Billy Jack.
Billy Jack goes to Washington.
I disagree with you that voluntarism (there is no "y" when followed by an "i" in the English language - that one pisses me off, they say "no rulers doesn't mean no rules" and then flout the rules of language itself 🤬🤬) and anarchism are somehow mutually exclusive, nor that anarchism necessarily needs/assumes violence...in being violent you justify their "chaos and destruction" trope.
I believe all human interaction should be free of force or coercion, that necessarily requires no rulers (anarchism).
Trouble is, all these brainwashed statists keep consenting to the system and I have to pay the cost for it or else get thrown in a cage or killed by armed order-followers.
Will you use violence to enforce your edict, voluntaryist?
'This is the best system that exists, there are no better options.'
Smdh.
No, it's just that better options have not been presented to the masses.
Your tyrannical overlords will never willingly give you the knowledge you need to escape your enslavement.™
Not my edict, just the rules of the English language.
This is what I'll do to you for putting in that unnecessary "y":
😆
Yeah, I'm aware that nothing much is likely to change without violent revolution, unfortunately...we certainly aren't going to change things by begging the masters to be nicer (protesting and/or voting).
Sooo,... no rulers except grammar nazis?
Until the masses reject that these people get to kill those people because reasons, we will always be ruled over they those most adept at hiding their killing.™
Grammarians rise up and fight!!!!
Grammar nazis uber alles!!
It's better than what we have now,...
!PIZZA
!PIMP
$PIZZA slices delivered:
@definethedollar(1/20) tipped @antisocialist
Send $PIZZA tips in Discord via tip.cc!