Lonnie Coffman of Alabama was found with multiple weapons in his vehicle and on his person. Coffman’s truck, which he had parked in the vicinity of the Capitol on the morning of Jan. 6, was packed with weaponry, including a handgun, a rifle and a shotgun, each loaded, according to court documents. In addition, the truck held hundreds of rounds of ammunition, several large-capacity ammunition feeding devices, a crossbow with bolts, machetes, camouflage smoke devices, a stun gun and 11 Molotov cocktails. When Coffman was detained, questioned and searched, police found two more handguns on his person. None of the weapons were registered, documents state. Coffman pleaded guilty and was sentenced in April to 46 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release. Source
Guy Reffitt of Texas was charged with bringing a handgun onto Capitol grounds. Court documents showed that Reffitt, reported to be a member of the Three Percenters militia group, told his family he brought his gun with him and that he and others "stormed the Capitol." A jury found Reffitt guilty of five felony charges in March, and he remains detained pending sentencing. Source
Christopher Michael Alberts of Maryland also brought his handgun onto Capitol grounds. An officer saw that Alberts had a gun on his hip and alerted fellow officers. When Alberts tried to flee, officers detained him and recovered the loaded handgun, along with a separate magazine. He has been indicted on ten felony counts. Source
Of course, even flagpoles can do a lot of damage Source.
upon seeing the footage of flash-bangs seemingly thrown to aggravate the crowd, with snipers positioned, I keep wondering if the purpose in someone's mind was to get whoever would be armed to bring out their weapon. Since no-one was armed, it just made the Capitol Police look like meanies.
I'll have to look for other sources for Lonnie Coffman - the source shows he pleaded guilty to one count of possession of unregistered firearm.
I started reading the Guy Reffitt dockets and when the expert said people forced their way into the Capitol Building, it didn't sync with the video footage showing them open the secure doors for them. Poison tree - poison fruit.
I'll look at the last one at some point, but I just get frustrated anytime anyone of any political leaning tells half the truth to make their point come out on top! I appreciate you bringing these up, and I am not accusing you of such. Just aching for honesty! And honestly, if the testimony is slanted, then how can I trust it on matters I do not happen to know the opposite is true. People were held in tortuous conditions until they agreed to plea guilty so they can try to live their lives again. I don't trust anything that comes out of this response to the protest and riot.
Hi Havestmoon! Totally understand, this is why I linked the court documents because I felt they'd be the least biased, most fact based documents available to the public.
Not everyone involved in J6 has pled guilty, and so with those trials we'll be able to see if there is evidence to prove criminality.
In regards to the force entry, don't forget that the Capitol building is just massive, with many entrances and lots of different sections and rooms. We've seen footage of people breaking windows and climbing in. We've seen hundreds of people pushing directly against the outmanned Capitol Police. There are literally thousands of stories about that day.
They were let in. No guns were Visible. Nobody was using guns. Meanwhile, BLM/Antifa zero such scrutiny. We known who the terrorists are and which side overwhelmingly resorts to assassination and violence.
I find court documents are usually very revealing. That doesn't mean that they are decided correctly. I don't see the pressures of plea bargaining being docketed. Maybe I haven't looked hard enough. It'd be nice to see a docket saying "Prosecution offers defense a plea of one count of possession of unlicensed firearm if defense agrees that Proud Boys is a White Supremacist group." Be aware the transparency doesn't always translate to action to right a wrong. A medical study comes to mind where the data in the study contradicted the conclusion of the study. Nothing was done to correct that because the conclusion was politically correct.
No, of course... but at least with some transparency we can make up our own minds.
I'd love to see dockets saying things like that, that'd be amazing. There's so much data that suggests a solid number of guilty pleas are because of unrelenting promises made and incredible pressure... and not because, you know, the person is guilty.
Lip service. You have no issues with Antifa and BLM, yet jan6 was Armed Insurrection!
The same with dismissing massive voter fraud as "unconvincing". Well you went to bat trying to discredit and " debunk" 2000 mules, even though, you had not even known about it before. You're a shill. This is 80 million votes:
80 million votes for someone who literally could not draw ANY CROWD, during the primary, and all through until he got selected at 4 Am EST indicated as a mathematical definition of fraud.
Did the people you know vote more than once?
Probably not, right, because that would be committing a felony.
The other 5 ballots were for other people in their household... so your friends would need to forge the signatures well enough to fool the signature verification process.
It's not expected that each of the 6 people in your friend's household visit the ballot boxes individually themselves... one person can put in the ballots of their friends, family and neighbours in the drop boxes perfectly legally.
2000 Mules never looked at the ballots that were dropped off in the ballot boxes, so they can't know that they weren't ballots filled out by different people legally and dropped off by one person. It's also totally legal for one person to do their neighbours a favour and drop of their ballots for them, even if it means the same person is visiting a drop box multiple times. There is no legal requirement that only the person filling out the ballot puts it in the drop box.
I've been perfectly fine with my wife dropping off my vote for me because I trust her. I know she takes it as seriously as I do.
2000 Mules also says that geotracking on cell phones is accurate to 12 inches. I asked a friend about this and he said in his experience it's closer to 16 feet, especially in areas without 5G.
I know we'll disagree on 2000 Mules and that's completely fine. It rings true to you and I'm not persuaded by it at all. I appreciate the effort you've put into answering my questions and I didn't know about 2000 Mules until you shared it. Have a good night.
You knew about 2000 mules because you clearly brought it up:
I mentioned before that the Hearing from today would be very interesting to you. Former AG Barr talks at length, under oath, about the 2000 Mules film by Dinesh D'Souza. I think you should watch all of today's hearing, but you'll definitely get a lot of out of specifically that bit.
Under Oath. Debunked by someone who never watched the documentary.
You're still Shilling, shilling for 80 million votes. You won't be persuaded at all by documentary evidence, you dismiss GPS location tracking which is exactly what Geolocation data refers to, (NOT triangulation by cell towers) (which even on 3g can transmit NO PROBLEM, since it has nothing to do with radio signals from CELLULAR TOWERS, but radio signals Received from satellites IT pings, the cellular data it sends and receives after that has no bearing on the location data it interprets EXCLUSIVELY FROM MULTIPLE SATELLITES, AS GPS IS NOT INCUMBENT ON CELL SERVICE) and try to claim that its perfectly legal to do their neighbors a favor and drop a ballot off, illuminating how ignorant of the process you are, and finally to exemplify the lack of credibility, you shill that people receiving ballots, mail in ballots, that they didn't request, is nothing wrong. You seem to think that nothing has been compromised. In fact, its illegal, unlawful, and goes counter to maintaining voter integrity, now that one person is in possession of multiple ballots.
A Handful of weapons don't make an insurrection, especially when none of the weapons were used in any way shape or form. Yet meanwhile compare the BLM riot response to jan 6! Racism? Classism?
Congratulations @dwinblood! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
You got more than 17500 replies. Your next target is to reach 18000 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the wordSTOP
What do you call a factory that makes okay products? A satisfactory.... Credit: reddit @dwinblood, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of @memehive Use the !LOL or !LOLZ command to share a joke and an $LOLZ (1/8)
Lonnie Coffman of Alabama was found with multiple weapons in his vehicle and on his person. Coffman’s truck, which he had parked in the vicinity of the Capitol on the morning of Jan. 6, was packed with weaponry, including a handgun, a rifle and a shotgun, each loaded, according to court documents. In addition, the truck held hundreds of rounds of ammunition, several large-capacity ammunition feeding devices, a crossbow with bolts, machetes, camouflage smoke devices, a stun gun and 11 Molotov cocktails. When Coffman was detained, questioned and searched, police found two more handguns on his person. None of the weapons were registered, documents state. Coffman pleaded guilty and was sentenced in April to 46 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release.
Source
Guy Reffitt of Texas was charged with bringing a handgun onto Capitol grounds. Court documents showed that Reffitt, reported to be a member of the Three Percenters militia group, told his family he brought his gun with him and that he and others "stormed the Capitol." A jury found Reffitt guilty of five felony charges in March, and he remains detained pending sentencing.
Source
Christopher Michael Alberts of Maryland also brought his handgun onto Capitol grounds. An officer saw that Alberts had a gun on his hip and alerted fellow officers. When Alberts tried to flee, officers detained him and recovered the loaded handgun, along with a separate magazine. He has been indicted on ten felony counts.
Source
Of course, even flagpoles can do a lot of damage Source.
upon seeing the footage of flash-bangs seemingly thrown to aggravate the crowd, with snipers positioned, I keep wondering if the purpose in someone's mind was to get whoever would be armed to bring out their weapon. Since no-one was armed, it just made the Capitol Police look like meanies.
I'll have to look for other sources for Lonnie Coffman - the source shows he pleaded guilty to one count of possession of unregistered firearm.
I started reading the Guy Reffitt dockets and when the expert said people forced their way into the Capitol Building, it didn't sync with the video footage showing them open the secure doors for them. Poison tree - poison fruit.
I'll look at the last one at some point, but I just get frustrated anytime anyone of any political leaning tells half the truth to make their point come out on top! I appreciate you bringing these up, and I am not accusing you of such. Just aching for honesty! And honestly, if the testimony is slanted, then how can I trust it on matters I do not happen to know the opposite is true. People were held in tortuous conditions until they agreed to plea guilty so they can try to live their lives again. I don't trust anything that comes out of this response to the protest and riot.
Hi Havestmoon! Totally understand, this is why I linked the court documents because I felt they'd be the least biased, most fact based documents available to the public.
Not everyone involved in J6 has pled guilty, and so with those trials we'll be able to see if there is evidence to prove criminality.
In regards to the force entry, don't forget that the Capitol building is just massive, with many entrances and lots of different sections and rooms. We've seen footage of people breaking windows and climbing in. We've seen hundreds of people pushing directly against the outmanned Capitol Police. There are literally thousands of stories about that day.
They were let in. No guns were Visible. Nobody was using guns. Meanwhile, BLM/Antifa zero such scrutiny. We known who the terrorists are and which side overwhelmingly resorts to assassination and violence.
I find court documents are usually very revealing. That doesn't mean that they are decided correctly. I don't see the pressures of plea bargaining being docketed. Maybe I haven't looked hard enough. It'd be nice to see a docket saying "Prosecution offers defense a plea of one count of possession of unlicensed firearm if defense agrees that Proud Boys is a White Supremacist group." Be aware the transparency doesn't always translate to action to right a wrong. A medical study comes to mind where the data in the study contradicted the conclusion of the study. Nothing was done to correct that because the conclusion was politically correct.
No, of course... but at least with some transparency we can make up our own minds.
I'd love to see dockets saying things like that, that'd be amazing. There's so much data that suggests a solid number of guilty pleas are because of unrelenting promises made and incredible pressure... and not because, you know, the person is guilty.
Lip service. You have no issues with Antifa and BLM, yet jan6 was Armed Insurrection!
The same with dismissing massive voter fraud as "unconvincing". Well you went to bat trying to discredit and " debunk" 2000 mules, even though, you had not even known about it before. You're a shill. This is 80 million votes:
80 million votes for someone who literally could not draw ANY CROWD, during the primary, and all through until he got selected at 4 Am EST indicated as a mathematical definition of fraud.
You knew about 2000 mules because you clearly brought it up:
https://ecency.com/hive-122315/@aussieninja/re-dwinblood-rdfulu
Under Oath. Debunked by someone who never watched the documentary.
You're still Shilling, shilling for 80 million votes. You won't be persuaded at all by documentary evidence, you dismiss GPS location tracking which is exactly what Geolocation data refers to, (NOT triangulation by cell towers) (which even on 3g can transmit NO PROBLEM, since it has nothing to do with radio signals from CELLULAR TOWERS, but radio signals Received from satellites IT pings, the cellular data it sends and receives after that has no bearing on the location data it interprets EXCLUSIVELY FROM MULTIPLE SATELLITES, AS GPS IS NOT INCUMBENT ON CELL SERVICE) and try to claim that its perfectly legal to do their neighbors a favor and drop a ballot off, illuminating how ignorant of the process you are, and finally to exemplify the lack of credibility, you shill that people receiving ballots, mail in ballots, that they didn't request, is nothing wrong. You seem to think that nothing has been compromised. In fact, its illegal, unlawful, and goes counter to maintaining voter integrity, now that one person is in possession of multiple ballots.
A Handful of weapons don't make an insurrection, especially when none of the weapons were used in any way shape or form. Yet meanwhile compare the BLM riot response to jan 6! Racism? Classism?
Congratulations @dwinblood! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 18000 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP!LOL
lolztoken.com
A satisfactory....
Credit: reddit
@dwinblood, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of @memehive
Use the !LOL or !LOLZ command to share a joke and an $LOLZ
(1/8)
Well said my friend. Pictures can say it all.