RE: Hive Sabotage by @pfunk the bully

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

You got a downvote, you didnt like it.
I think your problem is between you and Pfunk.

Hive is only supposed to offer you free speech. The token distribution from the reward pool no one is entitled to. Its decided by the voters.



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

true it was him downvoting all my posts and the projects posts while calling us scammers and I lost it, apologies I should not ask for help and tag people and have removed the tags.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You should learn how to ask for help. If you want help to gang up on someone you disagree with, who called 'all of you' scammers, why aren't you able, with 'all of you' to deal with it? Let's consider the fact you wanted everyone to alienate the user, is that asking for help, or asking for a fucking lynching? Don't you already have a mob?

You will remain a scammer from now on until the game delivers the equivalent of all the rewards you putrid morons sucked up.

0
0
0.000
avatar

putrid morons lol I am an early investor and Hive supporter yet guilt by association for helping an awesome project. Nice reputation... wonder why it is negative

0
0
0.000
avatar

Awww, you're proud of your high Rep, the moron who makes excuses as they are apologizing, aww, you're an eArLy iNvEsToR who goes crazy when someone says or does something critical, and like a putrid moron, the WoKe, DEMANDS EVERYONE CANCEL HIM.

You don't give a fuck about me, so thanks for the sentiment, its mutual.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The argument by some, if not most, notable curators is that free speech is not free if it is monetized. But I digress, our Hive content can not be deleted and is preserved despite downvotes. Which is cool!

0
0
0.000
avatar

99,9% of people online havent made 1 cent from their content, their engagement etc.
Monetization I do not consider in any way related to the free speech argument Hive relates to.
A 0 dollar post has its free speech guaranteed as much as the 1000 dollar one.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I understand the argument is all. Not trying to side with either side of it other than accepting that free speech isnt free. The argument is that free speech becomes tainted when incentives are in place ie sponsorships, curators, etc. for said content.

0
0
0.000